Assessing the clarity of Electric Vehicle Charging data

Charging infrastructure accessibility and the clarity of information represent significant challenges to the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). To gain insights into the quality of consumer information offered by charge point operators (CPOs), a recent study by steer examined the websites of 9 CPOs.
The study suggests that CPOs vary significantly in the information they provide. There is no one-stop-shop for EV charging information; each operator has its own unique approach.

All CPOs do offer information about charge point types. Some, like Total Energies and BP Pulse, employ icons to clarify plug types (e.g., Type 2, Combo, CHAdeMO), which aids consumer understanding. However, with a multitude of plug types, confusion often ensues, especially for those trying to match their vehicle’s compatibility.

Most CPOs (eight out of nine) provide details on the charge point’s maximum power output. Yet, a gap exists in explaining how this relates to a vehicle’s onboard charger. For example, if a car’s charger can only handle 80kW, a 350kW charger offers no added benefit.

Shockingly, only one CPO (Shell Recharge) classifies charging speeds as fast, rapid, or ultra-rapid. Given that speed in kWh may not be easily understood, this omission is noteworthy.

Six CPOs offer clear charge point status information, indicating whether a charger is occupied or available. However, the way they report this varies. Only four CPOs disclose the number of charge point connectors, which can be confusing for consumers looking to book or plan their journey.

Seven CPOs offer some price information, with some using kWh, others using time-based metrics. This inconsistency can perplex consumers. Moreover, only ChargePoint provides approximate charging costs, highlighting the complexity of estimating charging expenses.

Most CPOs provide route planning information, but only four divulge opening times. Information on booking charge points is limited, likely due to the potential for confusion and revenue loss.

While payment information is essential, only Shell Recharge and Allego provide clear details. The payment process is not always integrated with CPO maps, and payment is often facilitated through membership cards or contactless methods.

The study reveals that consumer information across European charge points is inconsistent and non-interoperable. The charging landscape is characterised by perplexing plug types, pricing disparities, limited booking options, and obscure opening times. As EV adoption accelerates, standardising and simplifying this crucial information becomes paramount for a seamless transition to electric mobility.

source: Electric Vehicles: Consumer Information Review | Steer

source: Electric Vehicles: Consumer Information Review | Steer
Related news

Nationwide Initiative Paves the Way for Highway Truck Charging

In a move set to redefine the landscape of long-haul trucking in Germany, a collaborative project…

read more
EV Charging
Published by: Editorial board | April 11, 2024

Understanding India’s new EV policy: prospects for Tesla and others

Amid a global slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) demand, major markets are witnessing a shift in…

read more
Electric Vehicles
Published by: Editorial board | April 10, 2024

Innovative recycling technologies for a sustainable battery industry

In a pivotal move towards sustainability, the battery industry is advancing its recycling processes, with a…

read more
Published by: Editorial board | April 9, 2024

India aims to propel the EV market in 2024, according to Canalys

In a transformative period ahead for India's automotive sector, particularly in electric vehicle (EV) adoption, the…

read more
Electric Vehicles
Published by: Editorial board | April 4, 2024